The Garmin Forerunner 165 has firmly established itself as one of the best value propositions in the running world, bridging the gap between entry-level trackers and high-end performance watches. However, as we look toward the future of the lineup, anticipation is already building for its successor: the Garmin Forerunner 170.
As a long-time observer of Garmin’s release cycles and hardware evolution, I’ve been tracking the patterns to predict when we might see this next-generation device and, more importantly, what upgrades it needs to stay ahead of the competition.
When Can We Expect the Garmin Forerunner 170?
Garmin doesn’t stick to a rigid annual release schedule for the Forerunner 100-series. If we look at the timeline, the Forerunner 155 was skipped in favor of the 165, which launched in early 2024. Historically, Garmin tends to refresh its mid-range fitness watches every 18 to 24 months.
Based on current production trends and software beta cycles, a Spring 2026 release seems the most plausible window for the Forerunner 170. This would allow the 165 to have a full two-year tenure as the primary entry-level AMOLED option while giving Garmin enough time to trickle down features from the higher-end FR265 and FR965 models.
My Forerunner 170 Wishlist: What Features Do We Need?
The Forerunner 165 brought the stunning AMOLED display to the masses, but there is still room for improvement. Here is what I am hoping to see when the FR170 finally hits the shelves:
1. Multi-Band GNSS (Dual-Frequency GPS)
This is at the top of my list. While the current 165 is accurate, it lacks the “All Systems” multi-band GPS found in the 265 and 255. For runners training in “urban canyons” with tall buildings or under heavy tree canopy, dual-frequency support would make the Forerunner 170 an unbeatable tool for precision.
2. Training Readiness Score
Currently, the 165 gives us “Training Effect” and “Recovery Time,” but it leaves out the comprehensive Training Readiness metric. This feature simplifies complex data—sleep, recovery time, HRV status, and recent load—into a single 0-100 score. Adding this would make the 170 a much more powerful daily coach.
3. Improved Battery Life in Always-On Mode
AMOLED screens are beautiful but hungry. While Garmin has made great strides, I’d love to see the Forerunner 170 push the boundaries further, perhaps offering 7–8 days of battery life even with the Always-On Display enabled.
4. More Storage for Music as Standard
The “Music” vs “Non-Music” distinction is starting to feel a bit dated. I’m hoping Garmin moves to a single Forerunner 170 model that includes Wi-Fi and music storage as a standard feature, rather than charging a premium for a separate edition.
5. Bezel Materials and Build
The Forerunner 165 is unapologetically plastic (fiber-reinforced polymer). While this keeps it light, a move toward a slightly more premium feel—perhaps a metallic-coated bezel or more durable Gorilla Glass—would help the 170 compete with the increasingly stylish offerings from brands like Huawei or Amazfit.
Final Thoughts
The Forerunner 165 was a game-changer for budget-conscious runners, but the Forerunner 170 has the potential to perfect the formula. By adding multi-band GPS and more advanced recovery metrics, Garmin could create the ultimate “everything you need, nothing you don’t” running watch.
Also Read: Is the Garmin Fenix 9 Worth the Wait? My Deep Dive into the 2026 Rumors
