HomeGarmin Forerunner SeriesGarmin Forerunner 70 vs 170 Comparison and Buyer’s Guide Buy DesFit

Garmin Forerunner 70 vs 170 Comparison and Buyer’s Guide Buy DesFit

Today I was watching some videos about the newly released Garmin Forerunner 70 and 170. I have seen that DesFit has released a video comparing the 170 and 70 to help people decide which to buy. He says these are Garmin’s newest “entry-level” watches, but they are very surprising because they pack in a ton of features for the money. DesFit mentions that these are some of the best values Garmin has ever offered because they include high-end tools that used to be very expensive.

Here is what DesFit says about these two watches:

Hardware: Identical Twins on the Outside

Des points out that if you put these watches side by side, you won’t see much difference. Both models feature a 43mm case and a 1.2-inch AMOLED touchscreen. They both use the classic Garmin five-button layout, meaning the “premium” feel of the screen is now standard even on the base model.

The Battery Trade-Off

One of the most interesting points Des makes is regarding battery life. Surprisingly, the cheaper Forerunner 70 actually lasts longer, offering up to 13 days compared to the 10 days on the 170. Des explains that while they likely have the same battery size, the 170’s extra internal sensors (like the altimeter) put a higher drain on the system.

Where the Extra $50 Goes

DesFit explains that the jump from the $249 Forerunner 70 to the $299 Forerunner 170 is all about “internal hardware.” Here is what he says you get for that extra money:

  • Elevation Data: The 170 has a barometric altimeter. Des notes this is crucial for trail runners who want to see their ascent and descent in real-time. The 70 can only show you this data after the run is saved via Garmin Connect.

  • Garmin Pay: Only the 170 supports contactless payments.

  • Sports Accuracy: The 170 includes a gyroscope. Des tested this in the gym and found that the 170 was noticeably more accurate at counting reps during strength training than the 70.

  • Swimming & Cycling: For athletes, Des highlights that the 170 adds Open Water Swimming and the ability to pair with cycling power meters, two features the 70 lacks.

The “Music” Factor

Des also mentions a third option: the Forerunner 170 Music ($349). Beyond just storing songs, Des points out that this version is the only one with Wi-Fi, which makes syncing activities and downloading software updates much faster.

The Final Verdict

DesFit’s conclusion is straightforward: the Forerunner 70 is the standout for value, offering the core health and training feedback usually reserved for expensive watches. However, he recommends the 170 as the “sweet spot” for anyone who needs to see hill data while they run or wants the convenience of Garmin Pay.

Also Read: Garmin Forerunner 170 vs. Forerunner 165: Is the New Version Worth It?

Andre Larson
Andre Larsonhttps://www.garminnews.com
Andre Larson is a dedicated endurance athlete and technical analyst specializing in the Garmin ecosystem. With over 8 years of experience tracking everything from trail runs to triathlon splits on Garmin wearables, Andre provides a unique "boots-on-the-ground" perspective on software updates and hardware leaks.
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

New Posts

Recent Comments